CELPIP Lecture partie 4 : exemple gratuit avec réponses

Un ensemble gratuit

Your article on banning gas leaf blowers missed an important point. I run a small landscaping company with four employees. Electric blowers cost almost twice as much, and their batteries last about forty minutes. On a full day, we would need several batteries per worker. I support cleaner air, but a ban that starts next spring gives small businesses no time to adjust. A gradual phase out, with a rebate for electric equipment, would get the same result without pushing companies like mine out of business. Larger firms can absorb the cost; we cannot. I would also remind readers that a rake is quieter than any machine, but our customers will not pay for the extra hours it takes. Helen Park, Oakville

1. What is the writer's main position?

   • Gas leaf blowers should never be banned.
   • Electric blowers are better for the environment.
   • Customers should use rakes instead.
   • A ban should be introduced more slowly.
   Afficher la réponse

   A ban should be introduced more slowly.. She supports cleaner air but asks for a gradual phase out with a rebate.

2. According to the writer, why is the ban harder for her company than for large firms?

   • Large firms can pay the higher cost.
   • Large firms already use rakes.
   • Large firms work fewer hours per day.
   • Large firms received a rebate.
   Afficher la réponse

   Large firms can pay the higher cost.. She says larger firms can absorb the cost; small ones cannot.

3. Why does she mention rakes?

   • To show that her company already uses quiet tools.
   • To argue that machines are not necessary in small yards.
   • To name a quiet option customers would not pay for.
   • To criticise the newspaper's article.
   Afficher la réponse

   To name a quiet option customers would not pay for.. A rake is quieter, but customers will not pay for the extra hours.